
“There's a
common misconception
that job engagement
-- high motivation at work --
is a personality trait and
that motivated people
will throw themselves
with equal enthusiasm
in to
pretty much
any job.”
|

Leaders often struggle to understand why their most talented
and engaged employees lose motivation. This paradox has been the
subject of researchers from Clemson University and the Walter Reed Army
Institute of Research in Washington, D.C. Clemson professor Thomas W. Britt
writes of his research in a recent issue of Harvard Business Review.
Britt studied the elite forces, those highly motivated,
highly trained soldiers who are on the front edge of many U.S. military
operations. Britt looked at the factors that motivated and the factors that
demotivated these soldiers. Then he examined to see whether the same
motivational forces applied off the battlefield.
What the studies found was that soldiers were frustrated when
they could not do the job they were trained to do due to vague rules of
engagement, little control, uncertain roles and a shifting mission. Simply
put, the Army Rangers who cared the most about their work were the most
demoralized when they were thwarted from doing their best.
Britt’s research did find parallels between the soldiers and
the workforce. Studies have shown that employees who are most engaged in
their work reported the lowest levels of job satisfaction when their work
roles were ambiguous. Britt wrote, “There’s a common misconception that job
engagement – high motivation to work - is a personality trait and that
motivated people will throw themselves with equal enthusiasm in to pretty
much any job. But research consistently shows that even the most committed
employees will rapidly be demotivated if they cease to find their work
meaningful or they can’t succeed at it. Thus, whether it’s a peacekeeping
mission or a product launch, the people in charge need to be vigilant about
removing obstacles impeding their most engaged employees – the very people
whom they may think need the least help in staying motivated. For these high
performers, factors they can’t control - role ambiguity, inadequate
resources, and overwork itself – can hinder their best work and may
ultimately drive them to seek jobs elsewhere. The ones who stay behind may
well be the ones who just don’t care.”
Often, organizations put
performance management systems in place with the hope of motivating
employees using objectives and clear metrics of measurement. Instead, these
studies suggest, the performance management system should appeal to the
employees’ intrinsic motivating factors. Instead of focusing on rewarding
production quotas and business unit goals, the measurement system should be
steered to identify those intrinsic factors that motivate people:
achievement, recognition, work itself, responsibility, advancement and
growth. Different personalities and life experiences, of course, will be
motivated by different intrinsic factors.
In order to effectively motivate, managers need to step back
from their own needs, objectives and assumptions and try to view the work
environment and goals from the employee’s perspective. What drives this
person? What are the needs that this person has? And, as Britt’s research
shows, what factors may be blocking this employee’s growth? When the
performance management system makes this turn and begins rewarding employees
based on self-motivating factors, only then can it become an effective tool.
Keys to balancing intrinsic factors
with a contingent workforce
These same management
principles can be applied to temporary or contract employees. First, ask
your staffing supplier if they provide the performance management tools.
You’ll also want to ask what screening tools the staffing agency uses to
identify intrinsic factors. Are there standard tools in place? Will they
develop custom tools for you? Or do you need to provide your own systems?
Second, make sure the temporary workforce has a clear
understanding of their role. Upfront communication in a thorough and
professional orientation will clarify the employee’s purpose and mission and
help avoid frustration later on.
Third, does your temporary workforce have a face-to-face
connection with someone who can answer questions, support their needs and
guide their performance? Does the staffing supplier have an on-site person
to manage employees? If not, what is the level and frequency of
communication between the staffing agency’s branch staff and the temporary
employees?
Although these three
components are fairly simple to implement, they are quite often missed as a
result of too few resources or poor communication. However, with proper
measurement tools, the establishment of clear expectations and personal
communication, your front-line supervisors and the staffing agency will both
develop more understanding of those intrinsic motivators that drive your
temporary employees. The result is often lower turnover, better attendance,
fewer errors, fewer safety violations, higher output and better control on
wage and benefit increases. |